Even as more people than ever enter British higher education, the gulf between the proportion of boys and girls going to college continues to widen.
“We were trying to think, what do young white males engage in?” said Gail May, East London’s head of external and strategic development. “And sport was a way that we could both reach these students and also potentially inspire them.”
That’s now the job of student coaches like this 21-year-old, Jacob Hood, who takes a small group of runners outside to a lighted track beside the noisy A13 carriageway.
“Sport is one’s sort of second family,” said Hood, keeping an eye on a stopwatch as he timed a laser-focused 16-year-old who was speeding through the damp East London chill in worn-out running shoes, short sleeves, an earring, and a hip-hop-inspired knit cap reading FRESH. Giving these teenagers the chance to meet college students like him, Hood said, “definitely opens them up to the possibility” of aiming higher.
“Generally people you’re coaching see you as a role model,” he said. “So if you’re talking about your experience at university, they’ll consider university.”
It’s a modest start to a huge undertaking. Even as more people than ever enter British higher education, the gulf between the proportion of boys and girls going to college continues to widen. A record 35 percent more 18-year-old females than 18-year-old males enrolled this academic year, according to the University and Colleges Admissions Service, or UCAS, which processes most of the nation’s college applications—50 percent more among the lowest-income Britons.
This means that 36,000 fewer 18-year-old men are on campus than would be there if the entry rates were equal—and that, eventually, there will be around that many fewer graduates to take jobs in the knowledge economy, including 12 million jobs the government expects to open up through 2020 due to economic growth, a wave of retirements, and other changes in the workplace.
There are many reasons for this gender disparity, in both the U.K. and the U.S. For one thing, females slightly outnumber males in both countries, making up 50.9 percent of the population in the United States and 50.8 percent in the U.K. For another, girls do better in school, scoring 16 percent better than boys in A-Levels, the standardized exams generally required to get into British universities, according to the British Social Mobility and Child Poverty Commission. It says that gap, too, is widening—and poor white boys do the worst of all.
“Well, I mean, it’s true,” said Hannah Gale, as she was campaigning on the University of Liverpool campus for the presidency of the student union. “When I was in school, girls were at the top of the class.”
Far fewer boys even take these tests or apply to college than girls, suggesting that the problem starts early. Research shows it’s also a universal issue: Girls in primary and secondary school globally read more than boys and spend more time on homework, according to the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, or OECD. Fifteen-year-old boys worldwide still score slightly better on international tests in math, the OECD found, but girls have caught up to them in science and do better in reading. And boys are 50 percent more likely than girls to fall short in all three areas.
Peer pressure also plays a huge role. At about the time boys turn 11, “it becomes uncool to try hard,” said Beer, the University of Liverpool president. “It becomes uncool to be academic.”
Unemployment among Britons aged 16 to 24 who are not in school is nearly 14 percent, among the highest rates since 1992, according to the Office for National Statistics, compared to the national average of 5.1 percent. The left-leaning think tank the Fabian Society projects that, while the wealthiest British households will see their income rise by 25 percent through 2030, the poorest will enjoy almost no gains at all, making them doubt the value of a university degree.
“Sport gives you a sense of belonging, of inclusion. You work together, you lose together, you’re on a journey together.”
There are similar trends at work in the United States, the Economic Policy Institute reports—including for young college graduates, whose inflation-adjusted earnings are lower than they were in the late 1990s.
But while skepticism may be growing about the return on this investment, statistics show that college does still pay. In the U.K., young men 25 to 34 with college degrees earn 47 percent more than their counterparts without them, the OECD says.
Women who finish college, on the other hand, earn 63 percent more than women who don’t. And while that hasn’t yet evened out the lower pay that women make in the same jobs as men (the shortfall in the U.K. is about 14 percent, according to the British Fawcett Society), it has helped fuel successful efforts to push more of them into it. Plus, decades of work to increase the proportion of women university graduates were so successful, they not only closed the divide with men; they inverted it.
In dentistry, for instance, said Francesca Ashton, who is studying that subject at the University of Liverpool, there are now “a lot more women.” That’s not a bad thing, said Ashton, in a country that didn’t even allow women to practice dentistry until 1912. Even with the lopsided majority of women dental students, it will take until 2020 for the genders in the profession to be even, according to the National Health Service.
“Hopefully in the next five to 10 years we’ll start seeing a more equal split at the top of businesses, in Parliament,” said Gale, the University of Liverpool student. “I think it’s a good thing.”
Only about one in 10 senior executives at major British corporations are women, an executive search form here reported. Women fare only slightly better at U.S. companies, at just under 15 percent, according to the Center for American Progress. And they make up 29 percent of members of Parliament and 19 percent of members of Congress.
It’s true that the shortage of men in college could speed women to their rightful place ruling the world, joked Beer, who is the first woman head of the University of Liverpool and one of only four in the elite 24-member Russell Group—the British equivalent of the Ivy League. “It’s taking too long, though,” she quipped.
She and others said the mismatch threatens serious consequences.
Men are forgoing college educations at a time when both Britain and America are trying to increase the proportions of their populations with degrees. The math is simple, said Levine: “If boys go to college less often than they otherwise would, you’re lowering not only their economic outcomes but economic outcomes for future generations.”
And that has resulted in the unusual outreach by the University of East London and others to coax more boys in general, and white boys in particular, into college. They’ve shown they can do it with girls, said Beer; now they’re trying to do it with boys.
Without this work, according to UCAS, the gap between men and women at British universities will grow even wider than the significant gulf on campus between rich and poor.
Former Universities Minister David Willetts said white males need to be encouraged to go to college in the same way ethnic and racial minorities are. And, because university fees in the U.K. are subject to government approval, the government has leverage to require that. If a university wants to charge the maximum amount, it has to present a plan to encourage so-called underrepresented groups to enroll.
Seventy-seven British universities, or about 45 percent of the total, report that they have programs to support men and young boys in general, the national Office of Fair Access reports; 51 of them, to help working class and white, black, and ethnic minority low-income boys in particular. There are fewer university efforts like this in the U.S.—but one example is a White House initiative called My Brother’s Keeper, is designed to lower crime and high-school dropout rates and improve college-going and employment prospects for black and Hispanic males.
Like boys everywhere, some in the U.K. imagine forgoing school to become professional athletes, said David Cosford, the University of East London’s director of sport. In his office above the university’s athletic facilities, he related the story of one who did manage—briefly—to play for a professional soccer club. Now, said Cosford, that man works for an undertaker.
“His dreams were smashed,” he said.
But others who have gone this route have enrolled at the university to become qualified as coaches. And some are among those working now with low-income boys nearby.
“Youth disengaging, not feeling a connection, is sometimes a problem,” Cosford said. “Sport gives you a sense of belonging, of inclusion. You work together, you lose together, you’re on a journey together.”
And coaches who have been on that same journey already?
“There are no better people to raise the aspirations of young people,” he said.
Back in Newham, another University of East London student, Dominic Stevens, works with young people at an after-school sports academy that uses basketball to help prevent youth crime. Like many of his young players, Stevens said, he was raised in a council estate, or public housing project.
“It’s just not the norm” for people from such circumstances to go on to college, said Stevens, who is 20. “They just don’t put enough belief in themselves.”
As a result, he said, “I’ll tell you what we lose. You don’t know what they’ve got in their minds. You don’t know if any of these guys have a cure for cancer. It’s things like university that bring that out.”
http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2016/05/british-universities-reach-out-to-the-new-minority-poor-white-males/480642/