Notre plus gros désaccords avec cet article et qu'il ne condamne pas la répartition de genre féministe  ici pour la manufacture il faut 35 % de femmes cette vision de la société et cet égalitarisme féministe sexué positif (l'égalitarisme tout comme le féministe conduit à des politiques et une idéologie contestables). On oublie outre le fait de resever des places à un genre on mène tous une serie d'actions  spécifiques au genre féminin comme  les partenariats avec les entreprises les financements et actions spécifiques un exemple girlswithcode en partenariat Raytheon. Le plus intéressant avec le féministe où ces normes elle nous dise aucune différence on fait des actions ciblées des programmes spécifiques, des recrutements spécifiques, des objectifs de féminisations dans les recrutements, les nominations, les entreprises pour remplir les objectifs de féminisation font des partenariats avec les écoles pour remplir les quotas.  Comme c'est une idéologie égalitarisme autoritaire il en faut toujours plus tous les ans il faut nourrir l'idéologie. Pour le féministe discriminé un homme et positif par contre une femme c'est négatif mené une action pour augmenter la proportion d'un genre et positif les STM, le numérique, l'informatique, un homme militaire, un patron, un banquier, un mécanicien sont des métiers et fonction qui doivent être féminiser la question c'est quand on connaît les méthodes et les textes législatifs qui les accompagnent imposer la parité, les objectifs de féminisations, les congés paternités, la guerre contre les hommes dans les métiers traditionnels. Je ne suis pas sure que le féministe soit adapté aux futures d'ailleurs c'est système rigide avec aucune flexibilité, imposé un taux de féminisation quand on manque d'homme ou on a des difficultés de recrutements quand les normes de réussite relatives à chaque sexe ne sont pas les mêmes. Vous savez quoi le plus drôle c'est quand on aura les 35 % de femmes dans la manufacture on va en faire des héroïnes mais c'est obligatoire et il faudra des objectifs plus ambitieux et si le taux de féminisation viendrait à tomber il y a aura un plan d'action.

https://gibm.substack.com/p/manufacturing-and-the-american-male?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=353975&post_id=117404011&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email

Bien que l'emploi dans des secteurs historiquement féminins (comme les soins infirmiers et l'éducation) augmentait, les emplois manufacturiers diminuaient et les agences gouvernementales faisaient pression pour plus de femmes dans le secteur manufacturier sans pousser pour plus d'hommes dans d'autres professions qui en avaient besoin. « Le Manufacturing Institute, le partenaire de formation et de développement de la main-d'œuvre 501(c)3 du NAM, a lancé sa campagne 35×30, une initiative qui vise à faire passer la part des femmes dans la main-d'œuvre manufacturière à 35 % d'ici 2030 » (Workforce).

Environ 30 % des femmes travaillent dans l'industrie manufacturière aux États-Unis, une proportion considérablement plus élevée que le pourcentage d'hommes qui travaillent dans les secteurs de l'éducation, des soins infirmiers et des soins de santé ; où les hommes ne représentent respectivement que 25%, 10% et 24% des emplois.

Au cours des 50 dernières années, les hommes dans le secteur manufacturier ont été en concurrence avec un certain nombre de forces, telles qu'une baisse des emplois manufacturiers, une poussée sociale pour embaucher plus de femmes dans le secteur manufacturier, moins d'opportunités universitaires, une nouvelle économie basée sur les services et moins de gouvernement. organismes qui plaident en leur nom. « Le taux d'activité des femmes était de 37,7 % en 1960 ; le chiffre était de 56,2 % en 2020. Au cours de la même période, le taux d'activité des hommes est passé de 83,3 % à 67,7 %. (1). En 2022, le programme de subventions WANTO (Women in Apprenticeship Non-Traditional Occupations) a accordé 3 400 000 $ à cinq organisations communautaires pour accroître la participation des femmes aux programmes d'apprentissage et aux métiers non traditionnels. Il n'y a pas de programme MANTO (Men in Apprenticeship and Non-Traditional Occupations) au sein du département américain du Travail pour travailler sur des initiatives similaires pour les hommes dans les domaines de l'éducation, de la santé, du travail social et d'autres professions où les hommes sont historiquement sous-représentés.

Des programmes de type incitatif pour les femmes ont été mis en place sur les campus universitaires à travers le pays, où des bourses réservées aux femmes ont été offertes dans toutes sortes de disciplines au cours des 50 dernières années et se poursuivent, même si certains de ces programmes sont majoritairement féminins et que les femmes sont plus nombreuses que les hommes à l'université d'environ 60% à 40%. Bien que les bourses basées sur le sexe soient une violation du titre IX, les écoles se livrent toujours à cette pratique. Le titre IX concerne bien plus que les femmes dans le sport ; il vise à prévenir la discrimination sexuelle, pour les femmes et les hommes, dans les programmes financés par le gouvernement fédéral. Qu'en est-il des hommes dans les STEM (sciences, technologie, ingénierie et mathématiques) ? Sur le plan technologique, les hommes sont les plus susceptibles d'occuper ces postes, mais cela varie vraiment. Bien que les femmes ne représentent que 22 % des programmeurs informatiques, elles représentent 45 % des concepteurs d'interfaces Web et numériques, 39 % des analystes de systèmes informatiques, 39 % des administrateurs et architectes de bases de données et 33 % des analystes et testeurs d'assurance qualité des logiciels (BLS). . Quand les gens pensent aux STEM, ils ont tendance à penser aux ingénieurs en logiciel. Il est tout aussi important de ne pas confondre les professions STEM en une seule catégorie. STEM comprend d'autres professions où les femmes réussissent plutôt bien. Les femmes représentent 58 % des biologistes et 46 % des chimistes et spécialistes des matériaux. Selon Zippia, 59 % des professeurs de sciences et 53 % des professeurs de mathématiques sont des femmes. Des hommes sans but et sans opportunité nuisent à la société ?

Appalachia has experienced some of the worst effects of job loss that seemed to stretch over decades and an opioid crisis that has impacted the region to such a serious degree that the 13 Appalachian states are “disproportionally represented in mortality rates, accounting for 30% of the U.S. population, but 50% of the excess mortality attributed to the “deaths of despair” (2).

13 Appalachian states (Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia) represented one third (32.5%) of the U.S. population but accounted for half (49.6%) of these excess deaths. Roughly one third (31.3%) of excess deaths occurred in four Appalachian states—Ohio, Pennsylvania, Kentucky, and North Carolina (Woolf et al).

The loss of manufacturing in America is symbolic of the loss of masculine energy in an America struggling to grapple with the importance and significance of men and how it fits into a culture that is openly hostile to them. When it comes to men, too many policy makers dismiss them with labels and offer little in the way of policy, thought, or compassion.

The challenges facing males, especially those who are not college bound, are multifaceted but rooted in a singular effort, special interest for some at the expense of others. The loss of manufacturing in America has had a direct impact on those without skills past secondary education and an increase in the deaths of despair. It’s not merely men who suffer when they do not have purpose and hope. All those who love them and the larger culture suffer with them.

Forty-eight percent of men without a bachelor’s degree in 1960 worked in manufacturing. In 1970, the U.S. landscape was filled with manufacturing towns. Jobs were plentiful, and young men who were not college bound could find gainful employment. They could get married, buy a home, and raise a family. The number of manufacturing jobs increased 17% from 1960 to 1970 and 23% from 1960 to 1980 according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Manufacturing was on the rise until the 1980s (before NAFTA and other outsourcing), but it was not keeping pace with other professions, such as education and nursing. The more the population grew the more teachers and nurses were needed. The same did not happen with manufacturing, even as more goods were needed.

Industries that were not being outsourced expanded at the same time Title IX and women’s rights movements expanded. Industries like education and nursing did not have to compete with foreign interests and were overwhelmingly female professions. Education jobs increased 128% from 1960 to 2020. Nursing jobs (RPN and LPN) increased over 350%. These professions are 75% to 90% female, and these are some of the fasting growing and most stable industries in America. Overall, women account for 76% of healthcare practitioners and technical occupations (BLS).

How did millions of men become displaced?

Although the number of college bound men and women increased, the share of college enrollment was shifting dramatically. By 1980, there were nearly 500,000 fewer men enrolled in undergraduate programs. The Male Gender-Gap in higher education continued to increase.

1.2 million fewer undergraduate males per year by 1990

1.6 million fewer undergraduate males per year by 2000

2.4 million fewer undergraduate males per year by 2010

2.55 million fewer undergraduate males per year by 2020

Although employment in sectors historically female (like nursing and education) were growing, manufacturing jobs were declining and government agencies were pushing for more women in manufacturing while not pushing for more men in other occupations that needed them.

“The Manufacturing Institute, the NAM’s 501(c)3 workforce development and education partner, launched its 35×30 campaign, an initiative that aims to boost women’s share of the manufacturing workforce to 35% by 2030” (Workforce).

Approximately 30% of women work in manufacturing in the U.S., a considerably higher proportion than the percentage of males who work in education, nursing, and health care industries; where males only account for 25%, 10% , and 24% of the jobs respectively.

Approximately 30% of women work in manufacturing in the U.S., a considerably higher proportion than the percentage of males who work in education, nursing, and health care industries; where males only account for 25%, 10% , and 24% of the jobs respectively.

Over the last 50 years, males in manufacturing have been competing with a number of forces, such as a decline in manufacturing jobs, a social push to hire more women in manufacturing, fewer college opportunities, a newer service-based economy, and fewer government agencies advocating on their behalf.

“The labor force participation rate of women was 37.7 in 1960; the figure was 56.2 percent in 2020. Over the same period, the labor force participation of rate of men fell from 83.3 percent to 67.7 percent. (1).

In 2022, the WANTO (Women in Apprenticeship Non-Traditional Occupations) “grant program awarded $3,400,000 to five community-based organizations to increase women's participation in apprenticeship programs and nontraditional occupations.” There is no MANTO program (Men in Apprenticeship and Non-Traditional Occupations) in the U.S. Department of Labor to work on similar initiatives for men in education, healthcare fields, social work, and other professions where males are historically under-represented.

Incentive type programs for women have happened on college campuses across the country, where female only scholarships were offered in all sorts of disciplines over the past 50 years and continue, even though some of these programs are overwhelmingly female and women outnumber men in college by approximately 60% to 40%. Although sex-based scholarships are a violation of Title IX, schools still engage in this practice. Title IX is about much more than women in sports; it is meant to prevent sex discrimination, for females and males, across federally funded programs.

What about men in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math)?

On the technology front, men are the ones most likely to hold those positions, but it really varies. Although women are only 22% of computer programmers, they account for 45% of web and digital interface designers, 39% of computer systems analysts, 39% of database administrators and architects, and 33% of software quality assurance analysts and testers (BLS). When people think of STEM, they tend to think of software engineers. It’s equally important not to conflate STEM professions as a single category. STEM includes other professions where women are doing quite well. Women comprise 58% of biological scientists and 46% of chemists and materials scientists. According to Zippia, 59% of science teachers and 53% of math teachers are female.

Men without purpose and opportunity hurts society?

This discussion is not meant to be a zero-sum game analysis. It is meant, however, as a small window into the displacement of the American male over the past 50 years and, more importantly, the ever changing landscape of family dynamics that have led to an increase in out-of-wedlock births, fewer marriages for young people, an increase in divorce rates in those over 50, and a higher number of deaths of despair. Family, on some level is out, and men are out with it. Where men once found purpose in family, they now find something else.

A 2019 report by the United States Congress Joint Economic Committee on “Long-Term Trends in Deaths of Despair” showed that males went from 25.2 deaths of despair per 100,000 in 1960 to 67.1 deaths of despair per 100,000 by 2017. With an exploding opioid crisis over the last 5 years, deaths of despair per 100,000 are very likely on the rise.

https://gibm.substack.com/p/women-20-29-face-lower-unemployment?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=353975&post_id=120546080&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email

Women represented 63% of recent associate-degree recipients and 58% of recent college-degree recipients in the labor force of those 20-to-29-years-of-age. The Male Gender-Gap in post-secondary education has certainly widened over the past several decades. And for those men who recently graduated college, they may have a harder time finding employment. The jobless rate of recent male-recipients of bachelor degrees was more than twice as high as that of their female counterparts, where the male jobless rate was 12.5 percent and the female rate 5.6 percent. Unemployment for males with associate degrees was even higher.

Male unemployment rates were significantly higher when it came to recent associate, bachelor, and college degrees (bachelor and advanced degrees). Although unemployment of men and women with advanced degrees by sex seems similar, women represented a much higher percentage (61.5%) of those with advanced degrees 20-29 years-of-age in the labor force.

When it comes to representation, recent female graduates are holding a much larger share of those in the labor force (20-29) with associate, bachelor, and advanced degrees.

College Prospects

Men and women with high school diplomas and no college had similar unemployment rates (9.60% and 9.66% respectively). The group most impacted are recent high school dropouts 16-24-years-of-age, where the unemployment rates for men and women were similar 19.1% for males and 17.8% for females. Males accounted for 55% of the high school dropouts in 2021-2022.

Although there was only a 2.3% difference in high school graduation rates for males (83.5%) and females (85.8%), females accounted for 58% of college freshmen in October of 2022. Female college continuation and participation rates were 9% higher than male continuation and participation rates.

Among 2022 high school graduates 16-to-24-years-of-age by race and ethnicity, Black college enrollment rates in October of 2022 were slightly higher than Whites and Hispanics, but the rates were not disaggregated by both race and sex. Asians had the highest rate of those matriculating to college from high school.

The current labor force data shows a Male Gender-Gap in the continuation, participation, and outcome rates of males in associate, bachelor, and advanced degrees. Additionally, the male percentage of high school dropouts is significantly higher.

The BLS portion of this data was not disaggregated at the intersection of race and sex, but certainly mirrors earlier finding that highlight male disparities across economic quartiles of Black, Hispanic, and White males that are only widening.

Suggesting race plays a larger role than sex is, at the least, misleading, as males across all racial lines are not doing as well as their female counterparts and in many instances worse regardless of race.

https://www.gibm.us/news/new-white-house-council-discriminates-against-boys-and-men

Several administrations have formed councils to advance women’s causes and issues. The White House Council on Women and Girls and the Office for Women’s Initiative and Outreach under previous administrations are predecessor of the new White House Gender Policy Council. Although the White House Gender Policy Council title includes the word gender, this gender council will exclude boys and men. In the Biden/Harris press release obtained from Forbes, the release uses the word girl 5-times and the word women 16-times while clearly indicating the White House’s intended purpose: to “guide and coordinate government policies” for the purpose of helping "girls and women” while ignoring the needs of boys and men. (The words boy and man do not appear in the press release or the policy for a council on gender). Replacing the word gender for the words women and girls gives the appearance of equality, but it's clear the council is not intended to engage in equality. This and other policy announcements are happening during the midst of a pandemic that kills more males than females (60-70% of COVID deaths are male) and has widened the education gap between our sons and daughters. Boys and men are doing much worse than their female counterparts in schools. New data shows the decline among men in higher education during the pandemic has worsened significantly more than it has for women.

“While enrollment in higher education overall fell 2.5 percent in the fall, or by more than 461,000 students compared to the fall of 2019, the decline among men was more than seven times as steep as the decline among women, according to an analysis of figures from the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center."

"In a sense, we have lost a generation of men to Covid-19," said Adrian Huerta, an assistant professor of education at the University of Southern California who studies college-going among boys and men.

https://gibm.substack.com/

https://gibm.substack.com/p/how-false-allegations-lead-to-the

https://gibm.substack.com/p/women-20-29-face-lower-unemployment